← Search

Amy McEvoy

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
NASHVILLE, TN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
91 matches · 55W–36L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history91 matches
W
2026-10-28 · Jones/McEvoy/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sonja Deere
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-10-21 · Jones/McEvoy/Nashville · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-09-02 · Palk/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Desiree Appleby
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 0-6
W
2026-08-26 · Palk/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Desiree Appleby
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-19 · Palk/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Desiree Appleby
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-08-12 · Palk/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elizabeth Ward
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-05 · Palk/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elizabeth Ward
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-07-08 · Palk/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allison Wright
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-01 · Palk/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Charlotte Wolfe
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-06-17 · Palk/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sonja Deere
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-03 · Palk/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allison Wright
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-04-22 · Jones/McEvoy/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scotty Falk
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
59.2%
42W–29L · 55.5% of games
7.5
65%
13W–7L · 51.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
37 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
27 matches
#2 Singles
14%
13 matches
#1 Singles
8%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova