← Search

Melinda Stone

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Franklin, TN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
179 matches · 111W–68L · seasons 2018–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2022. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history179 matches
L
2026-09-09 · Baumgartner/Collins/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jill Byrum
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-08-19 · Baumgartner/Collins/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Judith Gallagher
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-12 · Baumgartner/Collins/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mary Powers
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-08 · Baumgartner/Collins/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Large
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
Default
2026-07-06 · Comegna/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christie Harrison
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-17 · Baumgartner/Collins/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Large
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-10 · Baumgartner/Collins/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Gripenstraw
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-08 · Comegna/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mindy Higgins
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-06-01 · Comegna/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Charlene Marcum
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-27 · Brooks/Ramthun/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tammy Knowles
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-04-22 · Dearman/Gripenstraw/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nancy Russell
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-08 · Dearman/Gripenstraw/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Gripenstraw
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams61 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
75.9%
22W–7L · 58.7% of games
3.5
74.5%
38W–13L · 56.4% of games
4.0
47.5%
29W–32L · 47.5% of games
6.5
66.7%
8W–4L · 52.5% of games
7.5
45.5%
10W–12L · 45.7% of games
8.5
100%
4W–0L · 72.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
70 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
54 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
47 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer