← Search

Elizabeth Babcock

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Germantown, TN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
187 matches · 96W–91L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history187 matches
L
2026-09-08 · Lane/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kristen Corrigan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-22 · Schneiderman/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jean Ellen Sisson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-08-20 · Lane/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kristen Corrigan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-11 · Lane/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lauren Bloodworth
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-08 · Schneiderman/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Madelaine Cable
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-04 · Lane/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lauren Bloodworth
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-06-04 · Babcock/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacy Foreman
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-05-05 · Woods/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristen Corrigan
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-04-30 · Woods/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katrina Moore
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-29 · Lane/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Randi Mullaney
loading the estimate
5-7, 5-7
W
2026-04-23 · Woods/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristen Corrigan
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-04-22 · Lane/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristen Corrigan
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams56 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
51.4%
18W–17L · 53.6% of games
3.0
50.8%
31W–30L · 54.3% of games
3.5
48.9%
22W–23L · 51.2% of games
5.5
58.3%
7W–5L · 54.2% of games
6.5
55.2%
16W–13L · 51% of games
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 27% of the time
#2 Doubles
27%
51 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
50 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
49 matches
#1 Singles
11%
21 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
13 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova