← Search

James Kaczorowski

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Perrysburg, OH
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
239 matches · 141W–98L · seasons 2019–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2021. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history239 matches
L
2026-10-31 · NWO 7.5M Combo Howard/Langenderfer-TWOS · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Thomas Blaine
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-10-10 · NWO 7.5M Combo Howard/Langenderfer-TWOS · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Thomas Blaine
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 1-3, 0-1
W
2026-07-29 · NWO 40&Over 4.0M Williamson/Swartzbeck PTC · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-07-28 · NWO 18&Over 4.0M Meyer-PTC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Aaron Hershberger
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-20 · NWO 18&Over 4.5M Uribes-BGSU · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Caleb Bundy
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-15 · NWO 40&Over 4.0M Williamson/Swartzbeck PTC · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-14 · NWO 18&Over 4.0M Meyer-PTC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Benjamin Marshall
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-08 · NWO 40&Over 4.0M Williamson/Swartzbeck PTC · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-06 · NWO 18&Over 4.5M Uribes-BGSU · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Caleb Goff
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-30 · NWO 18&Over 4.0M Meyer-PTC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Aaron Hershberger
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-29 · NWO 18&Over 4.5M Uribes-BGSU · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Clayton Gifford
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-28 · NWO 18&Over 4.0M Meyer-PTC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Meyer
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams48 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
87.5%
7W–1L · 63.2% of games
3.5
84%
21W–4L · 61.7% of games
4.0
48.4%
31W–33L · 51.8% of games
4.5
11.1%
1W–8L · 32% of games
6.5
83.3%
25W–5L · 59.9% of games
7.5
52.4%
11W–10L · 51.3% of games
8.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 39.8% of games
6.0mixed
100%
9W–0L · 70.1% of games
7.0mixed
58.1%
25W–18L · 55.2% of games
8.0mixed
39.1%
9W–14L · 49.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 32% of the time
#2 Doubles
32%
77 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
75 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
69 matches
#1 Singles
6%
15 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova