← Search

Nancy ONeill

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lititz, PA
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
144 matches · 41W–103L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history144 matches
W
2026-10-07 · Hempfield - Woods Kelly · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kristin Schlageter
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-09-29 · Hempfield - Woods Kelly · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sharon Downey
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-09-28 · Hempfield - Woods-Kelly · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Gail Anderson
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-24 · Hempfield - Woods Kelly · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sandy Lutz
loading the estimate
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-09 · Hempfield - Woods-Kelly · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Sandy Lutz
loading the estimate
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-30 · Hempfield - Woods-Kelly · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janet Woods-Kelly
loading the estimate
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-07-25 · Hempfield Everlasting Lobstoppers - Culp · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Sandy Lutz championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-22 · Hempfield Sassy - O'Neill · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Debra Myers
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-07-15 · Hempfield Sassy - O'Neill · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathleen Jones
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-14 · Hempfield TCTT - Carson · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dorothy Love
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-12 · Hempfield TCTT - Carson · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dorothy Love
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-25 · Hempfield - Woods-Kelly · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Linda Mullen
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
53.3%
16W–14L · 52.4% of games
3.0
27.3%
6W–16L · 37.9% of games
5.0
15.4%
2W–11L · 37.2% of games
6.0
16.2%
6W–31L · 38.3% of games
7.0
20%
1W–4L · 31.8% of games
7.5
50%
2W–2L · 47% of games
8.0
35.7%
5W–9L · 41.7% of games
6.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 41% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 42% of the time
#3 Doubles
42%
61 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
42 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
38 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer