← Search

Margaret Kuhns

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lancaster, PA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
71 matches · 32W–39L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history71 matches
L
2026-10-30 · Hempfield - Broskey/Weik Bombers · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Alspach
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-07 · Hempfield - Broskey/Weik Bombers · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Elaine Rostolsky
loading the estimate
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-16 · Hempfield - Broskey/Weik Bombers · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathy Long
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
L
2025-10-02 · Hempfield - Broskey/Weik Bombers · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathy Long
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 0-6
W
2025-07-24 · Hempfield - Diamonds (Witmer) · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathy Long
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 7-5
L
2025-07-17 · Hempfield - Diamonds (Witmer) · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Alspach
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2025-06-04 · Hempfield - Diamonds (Witmer) · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Margaret Weik
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2025-06-02 · Hempfield - Diamonds (Witmer) · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Linda Witmer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
W
2025-05-29 · Hempfield - Diamonds (Witmer) · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathy Long
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-4
W
2024-11-21 · Hempfield - Broskey/Weik Bombers · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karen Vogel
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-2
L
2024-11-05 · Hempfield - Broskey/Weik Bombers · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathy Long
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2024-08-15 · Hempfield Titanium · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathy Long
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
50%
4W–4L · 57.5% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
54.5%
18W–15L · 52.4% of games
7.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
40.9%
9W–13L · 45.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 48% of the time
#2 Doubles
48%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
44%
31 matches
#1 Doubles
9%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe