← Search

Dianne Wassall

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Ephrata, PA
2.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
35 matches · 8W–27L · seasons 2019–2024
Match history35 matches
W
2024-11-05 · RCW - Mac Rac Pac · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joanne Bosch
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2024-10-22 · RCW - Mac Rac Pac · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joanne Bosch
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 4-6
L
2024-10-20 · RCW Loose Strings (Johnson) · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with John Pinder mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2024-10-12 · RCW Loose Strings (Johnson) · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with John Pinder mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2024-10-01 · RCW - Mac Rac Pac · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joanne Bosch
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
L
2024-09-24 · RCW - Mac Rac Pac · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bunny Gantt
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
W
2024-09-19 · RCW - Mac Rac Pac · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Duffy Johnson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2021-06-24 · Spring Chicks · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karen Silva
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2021-06-10 · Spring Chicks · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michele Bowden
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2021-06-03 · Spring Chicks · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karen Silva
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
W
2021-06-01 · Spring Chicks · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karen Silva
loading the estimate
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2021-05-21 · Net Sisters · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cheryl Martin
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
16.7%
3W–15L · 36.4% of games
6.0
26.7%
4W–11L · 35.4% of games
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 66% of the time
#3 Doubles
66%
23 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams