← Search

Bunny Gantt

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Mechanicsburg, PA
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
117 matches · 52W–65L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history117 matches
L
2026-09-09 · Hershey CC - Seiverling · #3 Doubles · with Virginia Lowe
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-27 · Hershey CC - Seiverling · #3 Doubles · with Ann Lady
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-02-24 · RCW - Mac Rac Pac · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jean Bednarski
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-01-21 · RCW - Mac Rac Pac · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Marsha Shirk
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 2-6
L
2024-11-05 · RCW - Mac Rac Pac · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nancy Luckritz
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2024-10-08 · RCW - Mac Rac Pac · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jane Barley
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2024-09-24 · RCW - Mac Rac Pac · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dianne Wassall
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2024-09-16 · Hershey CC - Seiverling · #2 Doubles · with Donna Bauserman
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
W
2024-09-09 · Hershey CC - Seiverling · #3 Doubles · with Virginia Lowe
loading the estimate
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2024-09-09 · Hershey CC - Seiverling · #3 Doubles · with Cliffeton Green
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-7
L
2024-09-06 · Hershey CC - Seiverling · #3 Doubles · with Sharon Weaver
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-7
L
2024-08-15 · Manheim - Crespo · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tammy Simonetti
loading the estimate
6-3, 5-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
69.2%
9W–4L · 57.8% of games
3.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
41.9%
13W–18L · 48.9% of games
7.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
43.2%
16W–21L · 47.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 48% of the time
#3 Doubles
48%
56 matches
#2 Doubles
41%
48 matches
#1 Doubles
10%
12 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert