← Search

Diane Cercle

Nampa, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
167 matches · 129W–38L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Diane Cercle to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history167 matches
W
2026-08-02 · #2 Doubles · with Nancy Edwards championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-01 · #2 Doubles · with Nancy Edwards championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-07-31 · #2 Doubles · with Nancy Edwards championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-31 · #1 Doubles · with Nancy Edwards championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-17 · Midcourt Crisis · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Edwards
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-11 · Honey Deuce 18's · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jean Nielsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-06-04 · Honey Deuce 18's · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Loria Sylvia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-01 · Midcourt Crisis · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Katherine Bleth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-05-27 · Midcourt Crisis · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michele Inghram
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-05-19 · Honey Deuce 18's · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Loria Sylvia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-29 · Honey Deuce · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dawn Lafrades
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-04-20 · Honey Deuce · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tiffany Roberts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
79.2%
19W–5L · 63.7% of games
3.5
75.6%
31W–10L · 63.4% of games
4.0
75%
3W–1L · 49.4% of games
6.0
81.5%
22W–5L · 63% of games
7.0
75.9%
22W–7L · 58% of games
7.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 51.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
66 matches
#1 Doubles
35%
58 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
37 matches
#1 Singles
2%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer