← Search

Lucy Krawczyk

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Scottsdale, AZ
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
133 matches · 49W–84L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history133 matches
L
2026-10-14 · 3.5 KIW1 Smash Volleys W40F · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Merja Reynolds
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-10 · 3.5 ISP2 Cardinali W55F · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Khristina Gerads
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-26 · 3.5 ISP2 Cardinali W55F · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melinda Muller
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-04-12 · 8.0 ISP The Breakfast Club W55S · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Villemez
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-03-29 · PHX/Cardinali/55&O/7.0W · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Melinda Muller
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-7, 0-1
W
2025-03-22 · 8.0 ISP The Breakfast Club W55S · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Denise Phillips
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-03-01 · PHX/Cardinali/55&O/7.0W · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Melinda Muller
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-2
L
2025-02-15 · 8.0 ISP The Breakfast Club W55S · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Alisa DeMartino
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L
2025-02-08 · 8.0 ISP The Breakfast Club W55S · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Villemez
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-02-01 · 8.0 ISP The Breakfast Club W55S · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Villemez
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 5-7
W
2025-01-25 · PHX/Cardinali/55&O/7.0W · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Melinda Muller
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 7-5
L
2024-11-23 · 8.0 ISP Sets In The City W55F · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Villemez
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
77.8%
7W–2L · 61.3% of games
4.0
25.6%
11W–32L · 43.8% of games
7.0
71.4%
10W–4L · 57.9% of games
8.0
31.3%
21W–46L · 42.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 46% of the time
#2 Doubles
46%
61 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
43 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
29 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams