← Search

Vladimir Abadzhev

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Montrose, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
247 matches · 109W–138L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history247 matches
W
2026-11-01 · The Bagel Shop/Hoffman/Tume · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Irina Abadzheva mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-25 · SGV Flint Fighters- Ortiz Reyes-Flint Canyon/SU4 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Humayun
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-18 · SGV Flint Fighters- Ortiz Reyes-Flint Canyon/SU4 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Pence
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-10-04 · The Bagel Shop/Hoffman/Tume · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Irina Abadzheva mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-2
L
2026-09-28 · SGV Flint Fighters- Ortiz Reyes-Flint Canyon/SA4 · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-27 · The Bagel Shop/Hoffman/Tume · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Irina Abadzheva mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-08-29 · SGV F.C. Aces-Stackhouse-Flint/SA2 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with TJ St Marie
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-22 · SGV F.C. Aces-Stackhouse-Flint/SA2 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Yukishi Yamamoto
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-25 · SGV F.C. Aces-Stackhouse-Flint/SA2 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with John Tatoulian
loading the estimate
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-14 · SGV Flint Foxpack-Kim-Flint Canyon/SA4 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Irina Abadzheva mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-13 · SGV Flint Fighters- Ortiz Reyes-Flint Canyon/SU4 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Tatoulian
loading the estimate
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-07 · SGV Flint Foxpack-Kim-Flint Canyon/SA4 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Irina Abadzheva mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams58 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.5
56%
28W–22L · 54.2% of games
4.0
38.3%
41W–66L · 45.7% of games
0.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
2.5mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 54% of games
3.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 52.1% of games
4.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 63.1% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
13W–26L · 44.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 29% of the time
#1 Doubles
29%
71 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
55 matches
#1 Singles
17%
41 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
35 matches
Singles
10%
24 matches
#2 Singles
5%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova