← Search

Elik Alvarez

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Pasadena, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
48 matches · 25W–23L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history48 matches
L
2026-11-01 · SGV Winner Winner Chicken Dinner-Moard-Arroyo/SU2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andy Tromans
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-18 · SGV Winner Winner Chicken Dinner-Moard-Arroyo/SU2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andy Tromans
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-27 · SGV Winner Winner Chicken Dinner-Moard-Arroyo/SU2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andy Tromans
loading the estimate
6-3, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-09-13 · SGV Winner Winner Chicken Dinner-Moard-Arroyo/SU2 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andy Tromans
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-07-25 · SGV Ball Hogs-Yip-Arroyo/SU4 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Andy Tromans
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-07-12 · SGV Ball Hogs-Yip-Arroyo/SU4 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ronald Yip
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-06 · SGV Winner Winner Chicken Dinner-Moard-Arroyo/SA2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andy Tromans
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-05-17 · SGV Winner Winner Chicken Dinner-Moard-Arroyo/SA2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andy Tromans
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-25 · SGV Winner Winner Chicken Dinner-Moard-Arroyo/SA2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andy Tromans
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-04-18 · SGV Winner Winner Chicken Dinner-Moard-Arroyo/SA2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andy Tromans
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-11 · SGV Winner Winner Chicken Dinner-Moard-Arroyo/SA2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andy Tromans
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-29 · SGV Winner Winner Chicken Dinner-Moard-Arroyo/SU2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Martin Vasquez
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
55.6%
5W–4L · 49.7% of games
4.0
51.3%
20W–19L · 53.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 71% of the time
#1 Doubles
71%
34 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams