← Search

Regina Gracie

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Naples, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
54 matches · 43W–11L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history54 matches
W
2026-10-26 · Mediterra / Ferraez · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Debra Dager
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-12 · Mediterra / Ferraez · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joan Steere
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-2
W
2025-11-24 · Mediterra / Ferraez · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ginger Ferraez
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
W
2025-10-13 · Mediterra / Ferraez · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joan Steere
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2025-03-15 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lori Murphy championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 3-6
W
2025-03-15 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lori Murphy championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-03-03 · Flight Winners /Mediterra / Ferraez · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lori Murphy
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-02-28 · Flight Winners /Mediterra / Ferraez · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lori Murphy
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-02-17 · Flight Winners /Mediterra / Ferraez · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lori Murphy
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-02-10 · Flight Winners /Mediterra / Ferraez · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Debra Dager
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-01-27 · Flight Winners /Mediterra / Ferraez · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lori Murphy
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-1
W
2025-01-20 · Flight Winners /Mediterra / Ferraez · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lori Murphy
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
75%
3W–1L · 58.7% of games
4.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
80%
28W–7L · 58.9% of games
7.0mixed
75%
9W–3L · 60.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 65% of the time
#1 Doubles
65%
35 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer