← Search

Carolyn Romano

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Naples, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
117 matches · 56W–61L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history117 matches
L
2026-10-26 · Grey Oaks / Werchek · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Veronica Howell
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-19 · Grey Oaks / Werchek · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Janet Seidl
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-03-02 · Grey Oaks/Romano · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joan Stolberg
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-16 · Grey Oaks/Romano · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jill Murray
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-19 · Grey Oaks/Romano · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jill Murray
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-01-12 · Grey Oaks/Romano · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Monica Callaghan
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
W
Default
2025-10-20 · Grey Oaks / Werchek · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joan Stolberg
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-04-14 · GreyOaks / Archie · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lindsey Burke
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
W
2025-04-07 · GreyOaks / Archie · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Archie
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 7-5
W
2025-03-03 · Grey Oaks / Romano · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jacqueline Spinelli
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-02-28 · Grey Oaks / Romano · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Monica Callaghan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L
2025-02-10 · Grey Oaks / Romano · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Julie Puntney
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
46.5%
20W–23L · 49.2% of games
7.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
58.3%
7W–5L · 50.7% of games
8.0
51.9%
27W–25L · 51.2% of games
8.0mixed
11.1%
1W–8L · 39.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
47 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
34 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe