← Search

Joan Stolberg

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Naples, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
102 matches · 63W–39L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history102 matches
L
2026-03-02 · Grey Oaks/Romano · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carolyn Romano
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-09 · Grey Oaks/Romano · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Heather Mylod
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-02 · Grey Oaks/Romano · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susan Aldrich
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-01-26 · Grey Oaks/Romano · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Monica Callaghan
loading the estimate
4-4
L
2026-01-12 · Grey Oaks/Romano · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susan Aldrich
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-01-05 · Grey Oaks/Romano · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Monica Callaghan
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
W
2025-10-27 · Grey Oaks / Werchek · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kristine Miller
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
Default
2025-10-20 · Grey Oaks / Werchek · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carolyn Romano
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-10-13 · Grey Oaks / Werchek · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Veronica Howell
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-05-13 · GreyOaks / Archie · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Robin Engelson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
2025-05-05 · GreyOaks / Archie · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Susan Aldrich
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-04-21 · GreyOaks / Archie · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Nancy Brown
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
7.0
62.7%
32W–19L · 55.2% of games
7.5
66.7%
16W–8L · 58.8% of games
8.0
55.6%
15W–12L · 51.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
43 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
25 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal