← Search

Monica Callaghan

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Hinsdale, IL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
20 matches · 15W–5L · seasons 2024–2026
Match history20 matches
L
2026-02-23 · Grey Oaks/Romano · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jill Murray
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-01-26 · Grey Oaks/Romano · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joan Stolberg
loading the estimate
4-4
W
2026-01-19 · Grey Oaks/Romano · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marie Wilson
loading the estimate
7-6, 7-6
W
2026-01-12 · Grey Oaks/Romano · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carolyn Romano
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-01-05 · Grey Oaks/Romano · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joan Stolberg
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-12-04 · Grey Oaks / N.Brown · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robin Engelson
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2025-11-13 · Grey Oaks / N.Brown · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janet Seidl
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
W
2025-11-06 · Grey Oaks / N.Brown · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lorrie Lavery
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-10-30 · Grey Oaks / N.Brown · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janet Seidl
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2025-10-23 · Grey Oaks / N.Brown · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janet Seidl
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-0
W
2025-10-16 · Grey Oaks / N.Brown · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lorrie Lavery
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-3
W
2025-04-28 · GreyOaks / Archie · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Janet Seidl
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
7.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 63.4% of games
7.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
60%
6W–4L · 51.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe