← Search

Veronica Howell

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Naples, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
67 matches · 42W–25L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history67 matches
L
2026-10-26 · Grey Oaks / Werchek · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carolyn Romano
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-16 · Grey Oaks / Werchek · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kristine Miller
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2025-12-01 · Grey Oaks / Werchek · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Margaret Werchek
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2025-10-13 · Grey Oaks / Werchek · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joan Stolberg
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-04-14 · GreyOaks / Archie · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Susan Aldrich
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W
2025-04-07 · GreyOaks / Archie · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Susan Aldrich
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-02-17 · Grey Oaks / Werchek · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Peggy Hogan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-02-03 · Grey Oaks / Werchek · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Margaret Werchek
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 6-7
L
2025-01-20 · Grey Oaks / Werchek · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bernadette Devoe
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 2-6
L
2025-01-13 · Grey Oaks / Werchek · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Harbert
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-01-07 · Grey Oaks / Werchek · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Harbert - *
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
W
2024-12-02 · COLLIER/Werchek/55&Over8.0W · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Harbert
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
55.6%
5W–4L · 51.5% of games
7.5
80%
8W–2L · 55.1% of games
8.0
61.4%
27W–17L · 53.7% of games
8.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 42% of the time
#3 Doubles
42%
28 matches
#1 Doubles
36%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
15 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer