← Search

Rhonda Hilton

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lexington, KY
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
265 matches · 98W–167L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history265 matches
W
2026-04-01 · KY/LEX/Ernst-Simonsen · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katina Swansegar
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-03-24 · KY/LEX/Simpson · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Miho Stepka
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-03-23 · KY/LEX/Walker/Johns/Albrecht · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Olivia Walker
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-19 · KY/LEX/Overstreet · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Wyndham
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-03-18 · KY/LEX/Simpson · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Aurora Kikrsey
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-03-16 · KY/LEX/Walker/Johns/Albrecht · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Taylor Wilcox
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-03-15 · KY/LEX/Gallagher-Ernst 55+ · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Yvonne Conner
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
Vee Ly / Dustin Ingram
2026-03-13 · Nightmare on Net Street · #1 Mixed Doubles · 0.0 · with Mike Bensing mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-12 · Nightmare on Net Street · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Taylor Wilcox
loading the estimate
0-6, 5-7
W
2026-03-09 · KY/LEX/Johns · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Taylor Wilcox
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-03-06 · KY/LEX/Overstreet/Walker · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Strange
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-25 · KY/LEX/Walker/Johns · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Aya Tsuchiya
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams79 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
0.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
2.5
46.2%
12W–14L · 50% of games
3.0
39.6%
44W–67L · 46.4% of games
3.5
24.5%
13W–40L · 38.6% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
5.5
53.8%
7W–6L · 49.8% of games
6.5
35.3%
6W–11L · 45.4% of games
7.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
0.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
62.5%
10W–6L · 55% of games
5.0mixed
22.2%
2W–7L · 40.1% of games
6.0mixed
30.8%
4W–9L · 35% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
103 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
87 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
62 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
6 matches
#1 Singles
2%
4 matches
#1 Female Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer