← Search

Megan Schultz

— year-end
15 matches · 12W–3L · seasons 2020–2022

Captains: add Megan Schultz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history15 matches
W
2022-06-27 · Queen City Chrome · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Tash
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2022-06-06 · Queen City Chrome · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Tash
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2022-05-16 · Queen City Chrome · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Schmitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-7, 6-2
L
2021-07-12 · Queen City Chrome · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Meg Meranus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 5-6
W
Kerry Vollmer / Jessica Cannon
2021-06-28 · Queen City Chrome · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paula Danis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 6-1
W
2021-06-21 · Queen City Chrome · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patti Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2021-06-14 · Queen City Chrome · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Schmitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 2-0
W
2021-06-07 · Queen City Chrome · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Schmitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 3-1
L
2021-05-24 · Queen City Chrome · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maggie Minich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2021-05-17 · Queen City Chrome · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Schmitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-1, 7-5
W
2020-08-03 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leigh Ann Schinaman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2020-07-27 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maggie Minich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
Teams2 teams · 2021–2022
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
4.0
80%
12W–3L · 58.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 53% of the time
#2 Doubles
53%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
40%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer