← Search

Carli Rivers

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Rochester, NY
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
58 matches · 27W–31L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history58 matches
L
2026-08-14 · Oak Hill: Rivers/Johnson · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Sara Ressler
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
Keegan Fisher / Leah Gordon
2026-08-10 · Oak Hill:Bartl-Conley/Rivers · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Nicole Pereira
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-08 · Oak Hill:Bartl-Conley/Rivers · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Dawn Deperrior
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-08-08 · Western: Game Set Margs · #2 Singles · 3.5 championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-08 · Western: Game Set Margs · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Henderson championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-07 · Western: Game Set Margs · #1 Singles · 3.5 championship
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-31 · Oak Hill: Rivers/Johnson · #2 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Sarah LoVerdi
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-27 · Oak Hill:Bartl-Conley/Rivers · #2 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Katie Lennox
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-25 · Western: Game Set Margs · #2 Singles · 3.5 championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-25 · Western: Game Set Margs · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with PK Morley championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-17 · Oak Hill: Rivers/Johnson · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Rita Kladstrup
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-15 · Western: Game Set Margs · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with PK Morley
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
0.0
53.3%
16W–14L · 52.9% of games
3.0
46.2%
6W–7L · 51.9% of games
3.5
30%
3W–7L · 39.2% of games
6.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 43.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Female Doubles, 26% of the time
#1 Female Doubles
26%
15 matches
#2 Singles
19%
11 matches
#2 Female Doubles
16%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
10%
6 matches
#3 Female Doubles
10%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
9%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe