Search

Erica Smedberg

Alexandria, VA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
140 matches · 106W–34L · seasons 20212026

Captains: add Erica Smedberg to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history140 matches
W
2026-07-30 · Team 1 NOVA Crush · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Danielle Frazier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-07-27 · Team 1 NOVA Crush · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Danielle Frazier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
Chandler Williams / Donald Fishmanchamps
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · with Rahul Sharma
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
Jeffery Glenn / Melody Glennchamps
2026-06-19 · #2 Doubles · with John Williamson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-06-19 · #2 Doubles · with David Viar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-06-13 · Team 10 Serve Me A Double · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elisa Wolf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-06-07 · Team 10 Serve Me A Double · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Holly Rasmussen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-30 · Team 10 Serve Me A Double · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Holly Rasmussen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-04-11 · Team 10 Serve Me A Double · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Velasco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-1
L
2026-04-03 · Team 10 PiF Winter X7.0 18 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Williamson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-03-28 · Team 5 Over Served · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christopher Cosca
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-03-21 · Team 10 PiF Winter X7.0 18 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Williamson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
3.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 67.4% of games
3.5
81.8%
9W–2L · 58.1% of games
4.0
40%
4W–6L · 45.5% of games
4.5
75%
3W–1L · 55.7% of games
7.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 60.7% of games
4.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
100%
9W–0L · 73.8% of games
6.5mixed
91.7%
11W–1L · 69% of games
7.0mixed
78.6%
22W–6L · 62.6% of games
7.5mixed
75%
6W–2L · 59.6% of games
8.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer