← Search

Melody Glenn

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lynchburg, VA
3.5C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
142 matches · 82W–60L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history142 matches
L
2026-06-19 · BCC Jester · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeffery Glenn mixed championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-19 · BCC Jester · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Phillip Miller mixed championship
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-28 · BCC Jester · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gary Sibcy mixed
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-03-22 · BCC Jester · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeffery Glenn mixed
loading the estimate
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-15 · BCC Jester · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Heppner mixed
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-03-08 · BCC Jester · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeffery Glenn mixed
loading the estimate
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-07 · BCC Jester · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Phillip Miller mixed
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-02-01 · BCC Jester · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeffery Glenn mixed
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-12-06 · BCC - Jester · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kenneth Hite mixed
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-11-16 · BCC - Jester · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Gary Sibcy mixed
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2025-03-22 · BCC Jester · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeffery Glenn mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-0
W
2025-03-02 · BCC Jester · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeffery Glenn mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
75%
15W–5L · 63% of games
3.5
53.7%
22W–19L · 49.6% of games
4.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 51% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 57.5% of games
7.0mixed
57.1%
24W–18L · 51.8% of games
7.5mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 41.8% of games
8.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 36% of the time
#3 Doubles
36%
51 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
45 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
42 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams