← Search

Fernando Garcia Banuelos

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Raleigh, NC
3.5C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
34 matches · 11W–23L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history34 matches
L
2026-07-21 · We.Dyke18T · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with West Ludwig
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-30 · We.Dyke18T · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with West Ludwig
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-16 · We.Dyke18T · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steve Crell
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-07 · Jo.Nance18A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bobby Hammond
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-26 · Jo.Nance18A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leo Manning
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-12 · Jo.Nance18A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leo Manning
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-03-15 · Jo.Nance18A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leo Manning
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2024-08-07 · Lo.Hatlen18M · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rosalyn Hatlen mixed championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
2024-07-14 · Lo.Hatlen18M · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Davis mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2024-06-16 · Lo.Hatlen18M · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Davis mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-2
W
2024-06-09 · Lo.Hatlen18M · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Gillespie mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-4
L
2023-10-06 · Jo.Nance18C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Billy Usrey
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
24%
6W–19L · 36.5% of games
6.5
40%
2W–3L · 50.6% of games
3.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 54.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
8 matches
#2 Singles
6%
2 matches
#1 Singles
3%
1 match
#3 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal