← Search

Robert Smith

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Springfield, VA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
125 matches · 93W–32L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history125 matches
L
2026-05-08 · Team 7 Mad Ranchers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sharon Sabasteanski mixed
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-12 · Team 7 Mad Ranchers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sharon Sabasteanski mixed
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-4
W
2025-11-23 · Team 4 mckeel - PiF Nova X7.5 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Laura Smith mixed
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
W
2025-11-12 · Team 11 Reynolds - Grand Slammers · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sharon Sabasteanski mixed
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-10-31 · Team 4 mckeel - PiF Nova X7.5 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Laura Smith mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-10-24 · Team 11 Reynolds - Grand Slammers · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sharon Sabasteanski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-06-25 · Anderson & Anderson · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carolyn Greis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
W
2025-06-20 · Anderson & Anderson · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carolyn Greis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
W
2025-06-09 · Team 1 Who Is We? Evolution · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joe Valdez
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-0
W
2025-06-07 · Team 5 Who Is We? Evolution · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Vamsi Krishna Nutheti
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-05-31 · Team 5 Who Is We? Evolution · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mark Jensen
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
W
2025-05-29 · McKeel - PiF Loco 55 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Williamson
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams48 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
76.9%
30W–9L · 66.8% of games
3.5
0%
0W–5L · 38.2% of games
6.5
100%
4W–0L · 67.1% of games
7.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
76.9%
10W–3L · 66.5% of games
6.5mixed
84.6%
11W–2L · 59.7% of games
7.0mixed
76.5%
26W–8L · 65.6% of games
7.5mixed
75%
9W–3L · 63.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
45 matches
#3 Doubles
34%
42 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
38 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert