← Search

Jennifer Mitchell

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
HANOVER, MD
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
324 matches · 247W–77L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history324 matches
L
2026-10-25 · MacDonald - MacAttack 7.5 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Hannah Arnold Smith
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-10-24 · Team 1 Baldwin · #2 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
7-5, 3-3
L
2026-09-21 · MacDonald - MacAttack 7.5 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Caryl-Lyn Mazullo
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
Default
2026-09-13 · Lob & Order: Special Tennis Unit DC Tri · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Valerie Ciccone
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-09-10 · MacDonald - MacAttack 7.5 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Hannah Arnold Smith
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-4
L
2026-08-31 · Team 1 Baldwin · #3 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-07 · Team 3 Graces Aces · #1 Singles · 4.5 championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-01 · Lim 4.5 Women · #1 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
5-7, 5-6
W
Default
2026-07-26 · Lob & Order: Special Tennis Unit DC Tri · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mona Mahmoud
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-11 · Team 3 Graces Aces · #2 Singles · 4.5 championship
loading the estimate
0-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-11 · Team 3 Graces Aces · #2 Singles · 4.5 championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-28 · Lob & Order: Special Tennis Unit DC Tri · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tomoko Itoga
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams83 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level18 levels played
2.5
100%
6W–0L · 67.9% of games
3.0
96.3%
26W–1L · 78.2% of games
3.5
100%
20W–0L · 73.2% of games
4.0
86.2%
56W–9L · 64.3% of games
4.5
55.3%
26W–21L · 50.7% of games
6.5
100%
6W–0L · 78.5% of games
7.5
62.1%
18W–11L · 59.2% of games
8.5
66.7%
14W–7L · 53.1% of games
3.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
81.8%
27W–6L · 65.6% of games
7.5mixed
85%
17W–3L · 65.6% of games
8.0mixed
75%
9W–3L · 59.5% of games
8.5mixed
41.7%
5W–7L · 46.5% of games
9.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 47.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
138 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
77 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
60 matches
#1 Singles
7%
22 matches
#2 Singles
6%
18 matches
Singles
3%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe