← Search

Valerie Ciccone

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
TAKOMA PARK, MD
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
306 matches · 173W–133L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history306 matches
W
Default
2026-09-13 · Lob & Order: Special Tennis Unit DC Tri · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Mitchell
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-09-12 · Lob & Order: Special Tennis Unit DC Tri · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Schrieber
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-3
W
2026-08-30 · Lob & Order: Special Tennis Unit DC Tri · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Schrieber
loading the estimate
6-1, 5-3
W
2026-08-30 · Lob & Order: Special Tennis Unit DC Tri · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Schrieber
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-08-16 · Lob & Order: Special Tennis Unit DC Tri · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Schrieber
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-0
L
2026-08-15 · Lob & Order: Special Tennis Unit DC Tri · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sarah Schrieber
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-5
L
2026-07-29 · Lob & Order: Special Tennis Unit DC Tri · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Schrieber
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-28 · Party at the Net · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Schrieber
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-5
L
2026-07-20 · Ifill - Net Ninjas · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Schrieber
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-19 · Team 6 Double Trouble · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Schrieber
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-07-19 · Lob & Order: Special Tennis Unit DC Tri · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Schrieber
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-07-18 · Team 6 Double Trouble · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Schrieber
loading the estimate
6-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams68 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
3.0
64.4%
29W–16L · 56.7% of games
3.5
63.4%
64W–37L · 55.8% of games
4.0
51.3%
40W–38L · 51.7% of games
4.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
71.4%
10W–4L · 59.3% of games
7.5
51.6%
16W–15L · 46.5% of games
8.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
20%
1W–4L · 38.2% of games
7.0mixed
69.2%
9W–4L · 59.7% of games
7.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0%
0W–6L · 42.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
110 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
71 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
62 matches
#1 Singles
11%
34 matches
#2 Singles
8%
24 matches
Singles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova