← Search

Linda Horta

Miami, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
201 matches · 130W–71L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Linda Horta to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history201 matches
W
2026-08-05 · WestonHills/Mei/Coluccio · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Raeven Yester
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-5
L
2026-07-29 · WestonHills/Mei/Coluccio · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Gabriela Reyes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-09 · Midtown/Vazquez/Vesga · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Peter Vazquez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-06-22 · Midtown/Vazquez/Vesga · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Juan Vesga mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
W
N/A
2026-06-17 · Midtown/Vazquez/Vesga · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brian Zirulnikoff mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-15 · Midtown/Vazquez/Vesga · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Juan Vesga mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-14 · MUVeltri/Contreras · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-3
W
N/A
2026-06-08 · MUVeltri/Contreras · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Natasha Burkett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-04 · MUVeltri/Contreras · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Audrey Gayle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-05-19 · MUVeltri/Contreras · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-05-11 · Midtown/Vazquez/Vesga · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Peter Vazquez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-6
W
N/A
2026-04-28 · MUVeltri/Contreras · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams61 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
0.0
100%
4W–0L · 65.6% of games
3.0
84.2%
32W–6L · 66.5% of games
3.5
71.4%
25W–10L · 61.8% of games
4.0
46.5%
20W–23L · 51.4% of games
5.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 74.2% of games
6.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 59.9% of games
7.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 51.8% of games
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
64.7%
11W–6L · 59.9% of games
8.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 48.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 31% of the time
#3 Doubles
31%
63 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
59 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
41 matches
#1 Singles
10%
20 matches
#2 Singles
7%
14 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer