← Search

Kanika Raja

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Charlotte, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
83 matches · 58W–25L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history83 matches
L
2026-07-22 · SJPragasam/KLoor (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda Cheek
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-08 · SJPragasam/KLoor (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jennifer Little
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-01 · SJPragasam/KLoor (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda Cheek
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-03 · SJPragasam/KLoor (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brooke Leonnig
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-30 · ERoach/SJPragasam (Jeff Adams) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Cheek
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-23 · ERoach/SJPragasam (Jeff Adams) · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-09 · ERoach/SJPragasam (Jeff Adams) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Margaret Cart
loading the estimate
5-7, 5-7
W
2026-03-26 · ERoach/SJPragasam (Jeff Adams) · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-03-12 · ERoach/SJPragasam (Jeff Adams) · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-04-30 · SJPragasam/ERoach (Jeff Adams) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Little
loading the estimate
6-7, 1-6
L
2025-04-25 · ERoach/SJPragasam (Hornets Nest) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with SJ Pragasam
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
W
2025-04-13 · SJPragasam/ERoach (Jeff Adams) · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.5
82.4%
14W–3L · 65.6% of games
4.0
33.3%
3W–6L · 42.5% of games
6.5
75%
3W–1L · 53.2% of games
7.5
66.7%
8W–4L · 56.4% of games
3.5mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 56.5% of games
7.0mixed
72.2%
13W–5L · 59.2% of games
8.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 68.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
21 matches
#1 Singles
17%
14 matches
#2 Singles
8%
7 matches
Singles
7%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
6%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova