← Search

Kris Kincaid

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lubbock, TX
3.5S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
33 matches · 7W–26L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history33 matches
L
2026-05-14 · Nichols · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eugenio Aulisa
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
W
Default
2026-05-07 · Nichols · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eugenio Aulisa
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-04-23 · Nichols · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-16 · Nichols · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dain Guetersloh
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-03-26 · Nichols · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Kyle Wooldridge
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
W
2023-06-07 · Miller · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elvira Cruz mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-4
L
2023-05-24 · Miller · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elvira Cruz mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2023-05-20 · Miller · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shannon Miller mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2023-05-19 · Miller · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paige Dane mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 4-6
L
2023-05-19 · Miller · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne Crago mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 3-6
L
2022-07-24 · Stickney · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Natasha Newman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2022-07-12 · Stickney · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Melissa Proffitt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
28.6%
4W–10L · 45% of games
4.0
20%
1W–4L · 41.9% of games
7.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
9.1%
1W–10L · 32.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 39% of the time
#3 Doubles
39%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
7 matches
#2 Singles
6%
2 matches
#1 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe