← Search

Sara Stacy

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Temperance, MI
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
138 matches · 45W–93L · seasons 2021–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2024. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history138 matches
W
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-10-10 · NWO 5.5W Combo Morgan/Pletz -Launchpad · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Maria Zapp
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-10-03 · NWO 5.5W Combo Morgan/Pletz -Launchpad · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Maria Zapp
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-26 · NWO 5.5W Combo Morgan/Pletz -Launchpad · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Andrea Grove
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-23 · NWO 40&Over 3.0W Glosser/Worth-Jermain · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Mott
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-21 · NWO 40&Over 3.0W Glosser/Worth-Jermain · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cindy Robertson
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-26 · NWO 40&Over 3.0W Glosser/Worth-Jermain · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Suzie Tsang
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-06-23 · NWO 18&Over 2.5W Stacy-Bedford · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Sue Mikkonen
loading the estimate
6-2, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-18 · NWO 40&Over 3.0W Glosser/Worth-Jermain · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Mott
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-06-16 · NWO 18&Over 2.5W Stacy-Bedford · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Alina Abramenko
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-06-11 · NWO 40&Over 3.0W Glosser/Worth-Jermain · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Johnson
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-03 · NWO 18&Over 3.0W DAY Zacharias/Minicozzi-Bedford · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Patricia Smith
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
54.5%
12W–10L · 54.1% of games
3.0
28.6%
12W–30L · 42.4% of games
3.5
0%
0W–4L · 21.3% of games
5.5
47.1%
16W–18L · 51.1% of games
6.0mixed
5.3%
1W–18L · 24.7% of games
7.0mixed
23.5%
4W–13L · 35.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
49 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
43 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
39 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal