← Search

Shamila Sharma

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Windermere, FL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
23 matches · 12W–11L · seasons 2021–2025
Match history23 matches
L
2025-05-02 · Isleworth-Siegel · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Noelle Siegel
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-0, 0-1
L
2025-04-18 · Isleworth-Siegel · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jen Small
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
W
2025-04-04 · Isleworth-Siegel · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bernadette Rampersad
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
W
2023-07-21 · Isleworth-Coughlin · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Rosana Obrokta
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-4
W
2023-07-14 · Isleworth-Coughlin · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Noelle Siegel
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-1
L
2023-07-12 · Isleworth-Coughlin · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Meghan Mannella
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L
2023-07-07 · Isleworth-Coughlin · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Katryna Marks
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
W
2022-05-06 · Isleworth - Heartt · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Noelle Siegel
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
W
2022-04-15 · Isleworth - Heartt · #1 Singles · 2.5
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2022-04-08 · Isleworth - Heartt · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Noelle Siegel
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2022-03-04 · ORANGE-Isleworth - Siegel · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Noelle Siegel
loading the estimate
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W
2022-02-28 · ORANGE-Isleworth - Siegel · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Heather Doyle
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2021–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
61.5%
8W–5L · 58% of games
3.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
5.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 50.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
5 matches
#1 Singles
9%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams