← Search

Erin Silav

LA JOLLA, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
153 matches · 82W–71L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Erin Silav to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history153 matches
L
2026-08-04 · SDNC 7.0 FRCC/ Wolgast · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Margaret Treese
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-24 · SDNC 6.0 KCP/ Markley · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jana Markley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-07-21 · SDNC 7.0 FRCC/ Wolgast · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Margaret Treese
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-07-14 · SDNC 7.0 FRCC/ Wolgast · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Haixin Li
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-16 · SDNC 7.0 FRCC/ Wolgast · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nellwyn Voorhies
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-0, 0-1
L
2026-06-09 · SDNC 7.0 FRCC/ Wolgast · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nellwyn Voorhies
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
N/A
2026-06-07 · SDNC 3.5 KCP (3PM)/ Gerardi · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-02 · SD 3.5 LJTC (3:2)/ Bruno · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-4
L
2026-05-29 · SDNC 6.0 KCP/ Markley · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jana Markley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-26 · SD 3.5 LJTC (3:2)/ Bruno · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tina Mertel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-03 · SDNC 3.5 KCP (3PM)/ Gerardi · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-21 · SD 3.5 LJTC (3:2)/ Bruno · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
56.9%
62W–47L · 52.9% of games
3.5
46.7%
14W–16L · 50.9% of games
6.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
20%
1W–4L · 44% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 75% of the time
#1 Singles
75%
114 matches
#2 Doubles
7%
11 matches
#2 Singles
7%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
5%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer