Teams

SDNC 3.5 KCP (3PM)/ Gerardi

2026 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SDNC WE · SDNC - Women- WE 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.38 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-13vs SDNC 3.5 RPTC (3PM)/ EreneaLost 02
L#1 DoublesDaiva Gedgaudas / Cristina Gerardi vs Denise Wilson / Katrina Lee6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLisa Shirley / Lorena Maquera vs Soo Chen / Jennifer del Rosario Bollish3-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesLauren Adams / Birgitte Bradshaw vs Kirsten Barton / Maria Garcia2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesErin Silav vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesYumiko Graves / Stephanie Liu vs Maureen Ford / Maria Fanianos6-3, 6-1
2026-05-31vs SDNC 3.5 RPTC (3PM)/ EreneaLost 12
L#1 DoublesDaiva Gedgaudas / Birgitte Bradshaw vs Cheryl Shah / Junli Feng5-7, 6-1, 0-1
W#1 SinglesStephanie Liu vs Nicole Taguiped6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCristina Gerardi / Yumiko Graves vs Soo Chen / Denise Wilson4-6, 5-7
L#1 DoublesYumiko Graves / Lisa Shirley vs Leslie Winkelstein / Andrea Jaksha2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesAlicia Larson vs Ilse Cappel4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLorena Maquera / Marisel Bastias vs Louise Melcher / Jennifer Dziura3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 DoublesDiane Vo / Marisel Bastias vs Margaret Holland / Rachel Wagner3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesStephanie Liu vs Jennifer Alden6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLorena Maquera / Daiva Gedgaudas vs Meghan Cate / Nikki Ostrem2-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesBirgitte Bradshaw / Alicia Larson vs Caresse Muir / Maria Garcia6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesErin Silav vs Maria Fanianos4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLisa Shirley / Nahomi Kato vs Lisa McDonald / Melanie Bowyer6-4, 7-6
W#1 DoublesMarisel Bastias / Diane Vo vs Christie Tenenbaum / Kelly Levine3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLauren Adams vs Lisa Williams6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCristina Gerardi / Alicia Larson vs Courtney Bustillos / Alli Ward6-1, 6-3
W#1 DoublesBirgitte Bradshaw / Diane Vo vs Hillary Emery / Annie Ruttenber5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesStephanie Liu vs Holly DuBois6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesNahomi Kato / Lauren Adams vs Felicia Kappes / Danna Dickson3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · SDNC - Women- WE 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SDNC WE LLW 3.5 Fairbanks Ranch CC/ Hackett6216820191
2SDNC 3.5 Santaluz (2:30PM)/ Reinoso6215923180
3SDNC 3.5 Rancho Valencia (2:30PM)/ Meyer53141026205
4SDNC 3.5 KCP (3PM)/ Gerardi44131126201
5SDNC 3.5 RPTC (3PM)/ Erenea44121228206
6SDNC 3.5 Scripps Aviary (2:30PM)/ Garcia26101433239
7SDNC 3.5 La Costa (2:30PM)/ Pasqualini1742044273

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Yumiko Graves
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.42
Lisa Shirley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.41
Diane Vo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.40
Birgitte Bradshaw
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Stephanie Liu
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.19
Marisel Bastias
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Cristina Gerardi
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
3.06
Alicia Larson
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.06
Lauren Adams
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
3.03
Erin Silav
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.00
Daiva Gedgaudas
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.92
Nahomi Kato
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.86
Lorena Maquera
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nahomi Kato + Cristina Gerardi4452% gamesnot enough data
Nahomi Kato + Daiva Gedgaudas4357% gamesnot enough data
Cristina Gerardi + Daiva Gedgaudas3252% gamesnot enough data
Marisel Bastias + Cristina Gerardi213 matchesnot enough data
Cristina Gerardi + Alicia Larson303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Yumiko Graves
4W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.44
Lisa Shirley
18W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.42
3.5
Diane Vo
16W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Birgitte Bradshaw
80W–42L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.40
Stephanie Liu
15W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Marisel Bastias
116W–100L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
3
Cristina Gerardi
155W–105L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%17%83%
3.13
3
Alicia Larson
59W–48L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%32%68%
3.06
Lauren Adams
25W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
3.06
3.5
Erin Silav
82W–71L career · 2 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
3.03
3.5
Daiva Gedgaudas
37W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
3.00
3.5
Nahomi Kato
90W–77L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
72%28%<1%
2.92
Lorena Maquera
8W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
2.86

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.