← Search

Russell Smith

— year-end
53 matches · 24W–29L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Russell Smith to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history53 matches
L
Kevin Miller / Dinh Le
2026-05-16 · Shipley/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brian Eason
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-05-09 · Shipley/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brian Eason
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
Matt Moss / Jared Smith
2026-05-02 · Shipley/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brian Eason
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-25 · Shipley/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brian Eason
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-04-18 · Shipley/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anthony Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-04-14 · Shipley/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brian Eason
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
Jared Smith / William Ogles
2026-03-28 · Shipley/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brian Eason
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-03-21 · Shipley/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brian Eason
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-03-07 · Shipley/Memphis · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brian Eason
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-11-18 · McKenna/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael McKenna
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2025-11-08 · McKenna/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Parks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-11-05 · Eason/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brian Eason
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
Teams30 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
51.3%
20W–19L · 52.9% of games
3.5
0%
0W–9L · 32.3% of games
3.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 53.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 53% of the time
#1 Doubles
53%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
8%
4 matches
#1 Singles
6%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal