← Search

Lisa Stewart

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Bargersville, IN
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
55 matches · 35W–20L · seasons 2021–2025
Match history55 matches
W
2025-03-20 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rebecca Arora
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-1
W
2024-05-22 · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-3, 5-3
W
2024-05-20 · CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 3.5 W, Faulkenberg (IRC-D) · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Martin
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
L
2024-04-23 · CIN Indianapolis, Combo 7.5 W, Curtiss (IRC-D) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Beth Pychinka
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2024-04-07 · CIN Indianapolis, Combo 6.5 W, Pychinka (IRC-D) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Megan Talpas
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2024-03-21 · CIN Indianapolis, Combo 6.5 W, Pychinka (IRC-D) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Beth Kay
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-2
L
2024-02-20 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laurie Rothbard
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
W
2024-02-19 · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2023-12-17 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Melanie Puckett
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2023-12-11 · CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 3.5 W, Faulkenberg (IRC-D) · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
L
2023-12-04 · CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 3.5 W, Faulkenberg (IRC-D) · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2023-11-20 · CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 3.5 W, Faulkenberg (IRC-D) · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams3 teams · 2024–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
73.3%
11W–4L · 63% of games
3.5
51.9%
14W–13L · 52.2% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
100%
6W–0L · 68.6% of games
7.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 51% of the time
#1 Singles
51%
28 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
9 matches
#2 Singles
7%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King