← Search

Laurie Rothbard

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Westfield, IN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
290 matches · 174W–116L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history290 matches
W
2026-10-27 · Indy A40 4.0W TUE IRCD Inselberg · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Beth Kay
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-10-23 · Indy CX 7.5 IRCE Golightly · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jeff Rothbard mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-10-20 · Indy A40 4.0W TUE IRCD Inselberg · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Kremer
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-10-05 · Indy A40 3.5W MON IRCD Inselberg · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Chlystun
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-09-19 · Indy CX 7.5 IRCE Golightly · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jeff Rothbard mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-16 · Indy A40 4.0W IRCD Inselberg · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberly Andersen
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-15 · Indy A18 3.5W IRCD Inselberg · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margaret Workman
loading the estimate
7-5, 4-3
W
2026-07-13 · Indy A40 3.5W IRCD Inselberg · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Martin
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-01 · Indy A40 4.0W IRCD Inselberg · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tracy Miller
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-29 · Indy A40 3.5W IRCD Inselberg · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Pearce
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-06-18 · Indy A40 4.0W IRCD Inselberg · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberly Andersen
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-15 · Indy A40 3.5W IRCD Inselberg · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Chlystun
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.5
75%
87W–29L · 58.1% of games
4.0
26.3%
15W–42L · 39.2% of games
7.0
78.8%
26W–7L · 59.6% of games
7.5
59.1%
13W–9L · 51.4% of games
8.0
50%
7W–7L · 44.2% of games
6.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
58.8%
10W–7L · 51.2% of games
7.5mixed
50%
9W–9L · 51.7% of games
8.0mixed
58.3%
7W–5L · 50.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
118 matches
#1 Doubles
37%
108 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
57 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova