← Search

Julie Moeller

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Indianapolis, IN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
125 matches · 81W–44L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history125 matches
L
2026-10-06 · Indy A40 4.0W TUE IRCD Faulkenberg · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marina Grabovsky
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-26 · Indy C 8.5W IRCD Thompson · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kessa McNaught
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-08-01 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Grable championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-14 · Indy A18 4.0W IRCD Faulkenberg · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karyn ODonnell
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-09 · Indy A40 4.0W IRCD Faulkenberg · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Grable
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-07-07 · Indy A18 4.0W IRCD Faulkenberg · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mae Joubert
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-23 · Indy A18 4.0W IRCD Faulkenberg · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Martha Harker
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-18 · Indy A40 4.0W IRCD Faulkenberg · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Grable
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-05-21 · Indy A40 4.0W IRCD Faulkenberg · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mae Joubert
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-05-07 · Indy A40 4.0W IRCD Faulkenberg · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Grable
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-05-03 · Indy A55 8.0W IRCD Pruitt · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Belinda Denning
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-26 · Indy A55 8.0W IRCD Pruitt · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Belinda Denning
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
67%
63W–31L · 56.1% of games
4.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 55.5% of games
8.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 40% of games
8.0mixed
60%
6W–4L · 52.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
55 matches
#2 Doubles
41%
51 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
16 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert