← Search

Tatiana Fagundes

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Salem, NH
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
36 matches · 23W–13L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history36 matches
W
2026-08-08 · CED:Cedardale Green:Moore · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Smith championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-07 · CED:Cedardale Kicking Aces:Chicoine/Cavallini · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sharon Stearns championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-07 · CED:Cedardale Green:Moore · #2 Singles · 3.5 championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-22 · CED:Cedardale Kicking Aces:Chicoine/Cavallini · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kate Dunham
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-15 · CED:Cedardale Kicking Aces:Chicoine/Cavallini · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily Norton
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-06-28 · CED:Cedardale Aces:Moore/McDonald · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mitch McDonald mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-27 · CED:Cedardale Aces:Moore/McDonald · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mitch McDonald mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-06-27 · CED:Cedardale Aces:Moore/McDonald · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mitch McDonald mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-24 · CED:Cedardale Kicking Aces:Chicoine/Cavallini · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julia Bethmann
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-17 · CED:Cedardale Kicking Aces:Chicoine/Cavallini · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angela Hayden
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
Default
2026-06-11 · CED:Cedardale Green:Moore · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Norton
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-03 · CED:Cedardale Kicking Aces:Chicoine/Cavallini · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diane Gurry
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
25%
1W–3L · 42.9% of games
3.0
81%
17W–4L · 61.8% of games
3.5
60%
3W–2L · 58.5% of games
6.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 47% of the time
#3 Doubles
47%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
6 matches
#2 Singles
14%
5 matches
#1 Singles
6%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer