← Search

Mitch McDonald

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Burlington, MA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
96 matches · 68W–28L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history96 matches
W
2026-07-06 · WOB:Casual Sets:Horan/McDonald · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew Horan
loading the estimate
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-29 · WOB:Casual Sets:Horan/McDonald · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Vibert
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-28 · CED:Cedardale Aces:Moore/McDonald · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tatiana Fagundes mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-27 · CED:Cedardale Aces:Moore/McDonald · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tatiana Fagundes mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-06-27 · CED:Cedardale Aces:Moore/McDonald · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tatiana Fagundes mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-22 · WOB:Casual Sets:Horan/McDonald · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Vibert
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-06-15 · WOB:Casual Sets:Horan/McDonald · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Vibert
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-12 · WOB:Casual Sets:Horan/McDonald · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Oberlander
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-11 · WOB:Casual Sets:Horan/McDonald · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Koby Noguchi
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-31 · CED:Cedardale Aces:Moore/McDonald · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Emily Norton mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-05-30 · CED:Cedardale Aces:Moore/McDonald · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Emily Norton mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-05-30 · CED:Cedardale Aces:Moore/McDonald · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Emily Norton mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
77.8%
7W–2L · 59.1% of games
3.5
79.3%
23W–6L · 60.9% of games
4.0
47.6%
10W–11L · 49.5% of games
6.0mixed
100%
10W–0L · 67.8% of games
7.0mixed
78.3%
18W–5L · 62% of games
8.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 49.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 58% of the time
#1 Doubles
58%
56 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
26 matches
#1 Singles
8%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
4%
4 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams