← Search

Eduardo Schlotterhausen

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
RALEIGH, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
146 matches · 112W–34L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history146 matches
W
2026-05-05 · Ed.Schlotterhausen18A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nick Gilder
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
Default
2026-04-14 · Ed.Schlotterhausen18A · #1 Singles · 4.0
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-04-07 · Ed.Schlotterhausen18A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steven Hood
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-03 · Ed.Schlotterhausen18A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steven Hood
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-0
W
2025-10-17 · Ed.Schlotterhausen18C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Francis Bustard
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2025-10-08 · Ed.Schlotterhausen18C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Benjamin Katz
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-10-01 · Ed.Schlotterhausen18C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Oheneba Boateng
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
L
2025-09-19 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nick Gilder championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-09-06 · TING.Byrd · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Benjamin Katz
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2025-08-30 · TING.Byrd · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Benjamin Katz
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-08-27 · Ed.Schlotterhausen18C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Frederick Holding
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2025-08-24 · Ed.Schlotterhausen18C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Deraymes Harris
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
77.8%
7W–2L · 60.2% of games
3.5
86.4%
57W–9L · 63.8% of games
4.0
59.3%
16W–11L · 50.7% of games
7.5
73.7%
28W–10L · 59.1% of games
3.5mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 54.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
47 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
40 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
39 matches
#1 Singles
9%
13 matches
#2 Singles
3%
5 matches
#3 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova