← Search

Ornob Roy

Charlotte, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
52 matches · 35W–17L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Ornob Roy to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history52 matches
L
2026-08-24 · CJacobs/ZGilbert (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Aaron Foreman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-29 · CJacobs/NBadr (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cynthia Hoover mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-06 · CJacobs/NBadr (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Claire Cox mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-06-29 · CJacobs/NBadr (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cynthia Hoover mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-7
W
2025-10-13 · ZGilbert (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Zak Gilbert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2025-08-25 · ZGilbert (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Zhen Zu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2025-08-04 · ZGilbert (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Zhen Zu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2025-06-30 · NBadr/CJacobs (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristen Agee mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-0
W
2025-06-02 · NBadr/CJacobs (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Claire Cox mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-05-19 · #2 Doubles · with Jonathan Diaz championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-04-23 · ZGilbert (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robert Marlowe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2025-03-05 · ZGilbert (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rafael Balderrama
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
80%
4W–1L · 66.3% of games
3.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
50%
7W–7L · 54.6% of games
3.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 59.3% of games
6.0mixed
84.6%
11W–2L · 68.5% of games
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 56.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 54% of the time
#1 Doubles
54%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
10 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer