← Search

Haley Hamrick

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Cleveland, MS
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
110 matches · 60W–50L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history110 matches
L
2026-10-20 · Hamrick Travel · #3 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-10-07 · Hamrick - BearPen · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jordan Langston
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-09-28 · Hamrick - BearPen · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Caroline Bond
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-09-21 · Hamrick - BearPen · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Merritt Harris
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-09-12 · Hamrick Travel · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mikki Respess championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katie Boykin championship
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-09-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mikki Respess championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 7-6
W
Default
2026-09-09 · Hamrick - BearPen · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Riley Harvey
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-08-06 · Hamrick Travel · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Herbison
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-20 · Hamrick · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lauren Brocato
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-07-19 · Boykin Travel · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mitchell McNeer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-06-30 · Boykin Travel · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kamron Daniels mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
56.1%
23W–18L · 51.6% of games
3.0
48%
12W–13L · 51.9% of games
3.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5
56.2%
9W–7L · 49.5% of games
6.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 48.8% of games
3.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 53.6% of games
6.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 51.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 38% of the time
#3 Doubles
38%
42 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
34 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
20 matches
#3 Singles
8%
9 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova