← Search

Jamie Gilliam

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Newberry, FL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
58 matches · 41W–17L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history58 matches
L
2026-10-18 · HCC/Johnson · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ann Redfern
loading the estimate
7-5, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-29 · HCC/Torres 7.5 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tara Edelstein
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-09-13 · HCC/Torres 7.5 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Stacey Anderson
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-29 · HCC/Jones · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Haager
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-08-28 · HCC/Jones · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margot Maurer
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2025-10-12 · HCC Rodriguez · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Caroline Hord
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-07-14 · Alachua/Fox/40&over3.5W · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Indelicato championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-07-13 · Alachua/Fox/40&over3.5W · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrea Love championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
Nancy Aloia / Amanda Patten
2025-07-13 · Alachua/Fox/40&over3.5W · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Yazdanpour championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Sally Farkas / Terry Wilson
2025-07-12 · Alachua/Fox/40&over3.5W · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hebah Fox championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
L
2025-07-07 · HCC Hovde Hawks · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrea Love
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2025-06-27 · HCC Hovde Hawks · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
100%
4W–0L · 87.3% of games
3.0
90%
9W–1L · 75.8% of games
3.5
75%
18W–6L · 58.4% of games
5.5
60%
3W–2L · 55.1% of games
6.5
50%
3W–3L · 51.9% of games
7.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 47% of games
2.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 29% of the time
#1 Doubles
29%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
13 matches
#1 Singles
16%
9 matches
#2 Singles
9%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer