← Search

Donna Lee

— year-end
30 matches · 19W–11L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Donna Lee to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history30 matches
W
2026-08-16 · RICHMOND TA/NICHOLL PK 40MX7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kyan Tsang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-08-09 · RICHMOND TA/NICHOLL PK 40MX7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brian Miller mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-26 · RICHMOND TA/NICHOLL PK 40MX7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Young Min Kim mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-20 · RICHMOND TA/NICHOLL PK 40MX7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Young Min Kim mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-11 · RICHMOND TA/NICHOLL PK 40MX7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brian Miller mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-06-14 · RICHMOND TA/NICHOLL PK 18AW3.5A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Samantha Ng
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-13 · RICHMOND TA/NICHOLL PK 40MX7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Young Min Kim mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-02 · SAN PABLO PK 18AW3.0A · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sally Bang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-05-30 · SAN PABLO PK 18AW3.0A · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Connie Ea
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-05-24 · RICHMOND TA/NICHOLL PK 18AW3.5A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrea Belgrade
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-05-23 · RICHMOND TA/NICHOLL PK 18AW3.5A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sheryl Yates
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
Jessica Kelly / Amy Jones
2026-05-19 · SAN PABLO PK 18AW3.0A · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Peyton Mason
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
Teams34 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 52.8% of games
3.5
44.4%
4W–5L · 50.8% of games
6.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
80%
8W–2L · 62.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 60% of the time
#1 Doubles
60%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
5 matches
#1 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams