← Search

Cristina Padron

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Los Angeles, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
201 matches · 117W–84L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history201 matches
W
2026-11-01 · FLoBs/Galvagni-deCastro/Scholl · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nancy Tran
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-10-29 · LA - Volley Llamas · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Margie Englis
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-10-24 · SGV Queens of the Court- Vuong-Arroyo Seco/SA4 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with May de Castro
loading the estimate
6-7, 5-2, 0-1
W
2026-10-18 · SGV Queens of the Court-Yu-Arroyo Seco/SU4 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Tran
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-10-10 · SGV Queens of the Court- Vuong-Arroyo Seco/SA4 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Diana Rochford
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-10 · FLoBs/Galvagni-deCastro/Scholl · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leigh Apel
loading the estimate
7-6, 2-4, 0-1
W
2026-10-01 · LA - Volley Llamas · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Margie Englis
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-09-26 · FLoBs/Galvagni-deCastro/Scholl · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Taylor
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-09-20 · SGV Queens of the Court- Vuong-Arroyo Seco/SA4 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anita Tang
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-27 · SGV Queens of the Court- Vuong-Arroyo Seco/SA4 · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-06-20 · SGV Queens of the Court- Vuong-Arroyo Seco/SA4 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with May de Castro
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-06-11 · LA - Volley Llamas · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Margie Englis
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-5, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams53 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 42.1% of games
3.0
78.3%
18W–5L · 65.5% of games
3.5
62.2%
56W–34L · 55.7% of games
4.0
42.2%
27W–37L · 48.3% of games
6.0mixed
77.8%
14W–4L · 60.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 31% of the time
#2 Doubles
31%
63 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
49 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
37 matches
#1 Singles
16%
33 matches
#2 Singles
9%
17 matches
#3 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova