← Search

Sai Dilip Ponnaganti

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Eastvale, CA
3.5C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
54 matches · 36W–18L · seasons 2021–2024
Match history54 matches
W
2023-12-09 · SGV Underdogs Red-Luzzi-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Praveenkumar Devarajan
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
W
2023-11-18 · LLW SGV Underdogs-Ponnaganti-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #3 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2023-11-05 · SGV Underdogs Red-Luzzi-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Irineo Galvan
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
W
2023-11-04 · LLW SGV Underdogs-Ponnaganti-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
W
2023-10-29 · SGV Underdogs Red-Luzzi-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alejandro Mejia
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2023-10-22 · SGV Underdogs Red-Luzzi-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pavan Akkimsetty
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2023-10-21 · LLW SGV Underdogs-Ponnaganti-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #3 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
W
2023-10-08 · SGV Underdogs Red-Luzzi-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alejandro Mejia
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2023-10-07 · LLW SGV Underdogs-Ponnaganti-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #3 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2023-10-01 · LLW SGV Underdogs-Ponnaganti-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2023-09-17 · SGV Underdogs Red-Luzzi-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Irineo Galvan
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-0, 1-0
W
2023-06-18 · SGV Underdogs Aces-Chang-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2021–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
80%
8W–2L · 65% of games
3.5
63.9%
23W–13L · 55.4% of games
6.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 53.8% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
10 matches
#2 Singles
13%
7 matches
#3 Singles
9%
5 matches
#1 Singles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams