← Search

Cara Lane

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
North Andover, MA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
108 matches · 71W–37L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history108 matches
W
2026-08-09 · SFT:Spark-A Red:Barry/Warren · #2 Singles · 4.0 championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-08-09 · SFT:Spark-A Red:Barry/Warren · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberly Keegan championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-08 · SFT:Spark-A:Red:Sideman/Schiela · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lynnell Schiela championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-08-08 · SFT:Spark-A:Red:Sideman/Schiela · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chelsie Foster championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-08-07 · SFT:Spark-A:Red:Sideman/Schiela · #2 Singles · 3.5 championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-08-07 · SFT:Spark-A:Red:Sideman/Schiela · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tricia Zullo championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
W
Default
2026-07-20 · SFT:Spark-A Green:Warren · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tina Shumway
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-06 · SFT:Spark-A Green:Warren · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dalia Paradie
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-25 · SFT:Spark-A:Red:Sideman/Schiela · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly O'Connor
loading the estimate
6-7, 5-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-17 · SFT:Spark-A Red:Barry/Warren · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lucia Andrade
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-06-08 · SFT:Spark-A Green:Warren · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michele Paonessa
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-04 · SFT:Spark-A:Red:Sideman/Schiela · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
84.6%
11W–2L · 63% of games
3.5
66.7%
34W–17L · 56.2% of games
4.0
33.3%
5W–10L · 47.1% of games
6.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 63.7% of games
7.0mixed
73.7%
14W–5L · 56.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
21 matches
#1 Singles
10%
11 matches
#2 Singles
7%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer