← Search

Shachenka Downs

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Boxford, MA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
87 matches · 48W–39L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history87 matches
L
2026-10-30 · SFTNA:Spark:Wild Cards:Lupa · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Julio Fuentes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-5
W
2026-09-11 · SFTNA:Spark:Buseck/Lupa · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Krishnaswamy Bennegudda mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-08-08 · CED:The Racqueteers:Ewing-Mahoney/Pangione · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melissa Stankus championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-08 · CED:The Racqueteers:Ewing-Mahoney/Pangione · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melissa Stankus championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-08-08 · CED:Cedardale Green:Moore · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Kastrinelis championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-07 · CED:The Racqueteers:Ewing-Mahoney/Pangione · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michol Stapel championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-07 · CED:Cedardale Green:Moore · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather MacAulay championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
W
Default
2026-07-23 · CED:The Racqueteers:Ewing-Mahoney/Pangione · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michol Stapel
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-23 · CED:Cedardale Green:Moore · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leslie DiNanno
loading the estimate
7-5, 3-5, 0-1
L
2026-07-15 · CED:The Racqueteers:Ewing-Mahoney/Pangione · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michol Stapel
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-07-09 · CED:Cedardale Green:Moore · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Kastrinelis
loading the estimate
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-08 · CED:The Racqueteers:Ewing-Mahoney/Pangione · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Wieckowski
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 55.8% of games
3.0
64.9%
24W–13L · 54.4% of games
3.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 58.7% of games
6.0mixed
30.4%
7W–16L · 44% of games
7.0mixed
63.6%
7W–4L · 54% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
25 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
20 matches
#1 Singles
9%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert