← Search

Amanda Gallagher

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Andover, MA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
44 matches · 20W–24L · seasons 2023–2026
Match history44 matches
W
2026-10-30 · SFTNA: Spark Plugs:van Ravestyn · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michel VanRavestyn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 5-2
W
2026-10-17 · SFTNA: Spark Plugs:van Ravestyn · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mark Gallagher mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-15 · SFT:Spark-A Red:Sideman/Sideman · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Valerie Colletta
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-08 · SFT:Spark-A Red:Sideman/Sideman · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nicole Friel
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-07 · IRCC:Indian Ridge:Edelmann/Evans · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Breakey
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-24 · SFT:Spark-A Red:Sideman/Sideman · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chryssa O'Connor
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-09 · IRCC:Indian Ridge:Edelmann/Evans · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary McKernan
loading the estimate
6-1, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-27 · SFT:Spark-A Red:Sideman/Sideman · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Valerie Colletta
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-06 · SFT:Spark White:Sideman · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mark Gallagher mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-02-20 · SFT:Spark White:Sideman · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mark Gallagher mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-01-23 · SFT:Spark White:Sideman · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mark Gallagher mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-01-09 · SFT:Spark White:Sideman · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mark Gallagher mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
50%
9W–9L · 50.5% of games
3.5
14.3%
2W–12L · 35.2% of games
6.0mixed
75%
9W–3L · 58.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 59% of the time
#1 Doubles
59%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
5 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer