← Search

Matthew Pearson

— year-end
27 matches · 17W–10L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Matthew Pearson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history27 matches
L
Andrew Paik / Patrick Julian
2026-07-23 · CDTA S 40&OM3.0 2.Wilm McMahon Sat 1 $20 · #1 Doubles · with Meeraj Thaker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
Mike Bufalino / Kevin Swank
2026-07-18 · CDTA S 40&OM3.0 2.Wilm McMahon Sat 1 $20 · #1 Doubles · with Meeraj Thaker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
Nick Miller / John Schaefer
2026-05-30 · CDTA S 40&OM3.0 2.Wilm McMahon Sat 1 $20 · #3 Doubles · with TERENCE MCMAHON
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-1
L
Andrew Paik / Manuel Rus
2025-01-18 · CDTA W 18&OM3.0 7.Centennial McMahon Sat 1 $20 · #1 Doubles · with Barney Straus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
W
Jeff Siegel / James Nelson
2023-07-22 · #1 Doubles · with Amit Mallik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2023-07-15 · #1 Singles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
Leon Voskov / Jeremy Bradford
2023-06-17 · #1 Doubles · with Steven Howard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W
2023-06-10 · #1 Singles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2023-04-22 · #2 Singles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-0
W
2023-04-15 · #1 Singles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2023-03-11 · #1 Doubles · with Frank Barbaro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2023-02-25 · #2 Singles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-2
Teams2 teams · 2025–2026
CDTA S 40&OM3.0 2.Wilm McMahon Sat 1 $20
1Summer 40&O WN · WE · 40+
2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 66.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova